Closed wchresta closed 6 years ago
IIRC, &&
and ||
are simply invalid syntax in Jinja2, so supporting them when Jinja does not isn't going to break any Jinja templates on Ginger, but would make Ginger more useful. (In other words, being able to run Jinja templates on Ginger has a much higher priority for me than the other way around).
Alright, I'll adapt the fix to support both, and
and &&
Jinja2 uses the python-style logical operators:
while ginger uses
&&
and||
and rejectsand
andor
. Ginger should use the python-style logic operators and reject&&
.