Closed ejconlon closed 4 years ago
Hmm, I'm not 100% sure I like it like this.
Getting things to compile cleanly on 8.8 is of course necessary, but I think that rather than make fail
work, we should get rid of it - it's kind of an ad-hoc solution to the problem of dealing with failures, and I'd much rather resort to a more "proper" solution, probably something along the lines of a more descriptive error type and ExceptT
.
I'm particularly unhappy with extending runGinger
, which is supposed to be (technically and morally) pure to return an arbitrary m
.
I'll do some thinking on this and get back to you.
On this note: #49
Ok, thanks for looking!
Tests pass with Stackage LTS-15.11.