Clarify the examples given in the notes on dwc:identificationQualifier

[GoogleCodeExporter]

1. Provide an ac Term Name or Label. dwc:identificationQualifier 
http://terms.gbif.org/wiki/Audubon_Core_Term_List_%281.0_normative%29#dwc:identi
ficationQualifier

2. Describe the defect or lack of clarity you find in the term. 

Note from Moore, Gerry - NRCS, Greensboro, NC <Gerry.Moore@gnb.usda.gov> during 
public comment:

The following is given: Examples: 1) For the determinations “cf. Quercus 
agrifolia var. oxyadenia”, “Quercus cf. agrifolia var. oxyadenia”, 
“Quercus agrifolia cf. var. oxyadenia”, Scientific Taxon Name would always 
be “Quercus agrifolia var. oxyadenia”, with Identification Qualifier “cf. 
genus”, “cf. species” and “cf. var.”, respectively.

These examples seem odd.  For example “cf. Quercus agrifolia var. 
oxyadenia” implies that it is not clear if the entity in question is properly 
identified to belong to the genus Quercus but is confidently placed in the 
species and variety. But how can this be since the species and variety 
identification is contingent upon the proper generic placement?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by steve.ba...@vanderbilt.edu on 9 Apr 2013 at 2:50

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Gregor should address

Original comment by morris.bob on 3 Jun 2013 at 4:52

• Added labels: Priority-Critical

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by morris.bob on 3 Jun 2013 at 5:07

• Added labels: Milestone-Release1.0

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I agree this is a bad example. Replace with  (this example is possible, 
pathogenic fungus!):

Examples: 1) For the determinations “cf. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. 
palmarum”, “Fusarium cf. oxysporum f. sp. palmarum”, “Fusarium 
oxysporum cf. f. sp. palmarum” the Scientific Taxon Name would always be 
“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. palmarum”, with Identification Qualifier “cf. 
genus”, “cf. species” and “cf. f.sp.”, respectively. In most cases 
only the lowest taxon is in doubt, but cases exist where good reasons exist to 
suspect a specific or even infraspecific determination, without having a save 
generic identification.

Original comment by g.m.hage...@gmail.com on 5 Jun 2013 at 6:38

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Done, but change "Examples: 1)" to "Example:"
Resolving as Fixed

Original comment by morris.bob on 12 Jun 2013 at 11:54

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by morris.bob on 12 Jun 2013 at 11:55

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by morris.bob on 3 Jul 2013 at 3:27

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by morris.bob on 5 Jul 2013 at 4:02

• Now blocking: #81

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by morris.bob on 5 Jul 2013 at 4:04

[GoogleCodeExporter]

added self to cc list

Original comment by morris.bob on 25 Aug 2013 at 9:01

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by morris.bob on 22 Oct 2013 at 1:57

• Added labels: Type-Defect