Open godfoder opened 6 years ago
TestField | Value |
---|---|
GUID | f2ce7d55-5b1d-426a-b00e-6d4efe3058ec |
Label | VALIDATION_GENUS_FOUND |
Description | Does the value of dwc:genus occur at the rank of Genus in the bdq:sourceAuthority? |
TestType | Validation |
Darwin Core Class | dwc:Taxon |
Information Elements ActedUpon | dwc:genus |
Information Elements Consulted | |
Expected Response | EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available; INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:genus is bdq:Empty; COMPLIANT if the value of dwc:genus is found as a value at the rank of genus in the bdq:sourceAuthority; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT |
Data Quality Dimension | Conformance |
Term-Actions | GENUS_FOUND |
Parameter(s) | bdq:sourceAuthority |
Source Authority | bdq:sourceAuthority default = "GBIF Backbone Taxonomy" {[https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei]} {API endpoint [https://api.gbif.org/v1/species?datasetKey=d7dddbf4-2cf0-4f39-9b2a-bb099caae36c&name=]} |
Specification Last Updated | 2023-09-18 |
Examples | [dwc:genus="Egernia": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:genus has an equivalent at the rank of Genus in the Parameterized Source Authority"] |
[dwc:genus="Egernea": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=NOT_COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:genus does not have an equivalent at the rank of Genus in the bdq:sourceAuthority. This may be fixed using fuzzy matching at the AMENDMENT stage"] | |
Source | iDigBio |
References |
|
Example Implementations (Mechanisms) | Kurator/FilteredPush sci_name_qc Library |
Link to Specification Source Code | https://github.com/FilteredPush/sci_name_qc/blob/v1.1.2/src/main/java/org/filteredpush/qc/sciname/DwCSciNameDQ.java#L2003 |
Notes | The purpose of this test is to check whether the value is a name that is a result of a nomenclatural act at this rank. This excludes unpublished names, misspellings and vernacular names. It is expected that the test will designate the source authority against which to check. The same test might return distinct results when using distinct source authorities. |
Do we need dwc:genericName as an Information Element? If so, we also need an amended Expected Response.
@Tasilee, no dwc:genericName isn't needed in this test, it looks at just the dwc:genus term (which under the Darwin Core definitions is a classification term rather than a part of scientificName.
We could have a separate test for genericName not found, but we don't have correspondng tests for the other terms that form parts of dwc:scientificName.
uuid for this test (3667556d-d8f5-454c-922b-af8af38f613c) duplicated that of #28, likely copy/paste error. replaced this test with f2ce7d55-5b1d-426a-b00e-6d4efe3058ec
Restructured Parameter(s) and Source authority
Amended Source Authority values to align with @chicoreus syntax
From
bdq:sourceAuthority default = "GBIF Backbone Taxonomy" [https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei] | | | API endpoint [https://api.gbif.org/v1/species?datasetKey=d7dddbf4-2cf0-4f39-9b2a-bb099caae36c&name=]
to
bdq:sourceAuthority default = "GBIF Backbone Taxonomy" {[https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei]} {API endpoint [https://api.gbif.org/v1/species?datasetKey=d7dddbf4-2cf0-4f39-9b2a-bb099caae36c&name=]}
Splitting bdqffdq:Information Elements into "Information Elements ActedUpon" and "Information Elements Consulted".
Also changed "Field" to "TestField", "Output Type" to "TestType" and updated "Specification Last Updated"