TG2-VALIDATION_STATEPROVINCE_FOUND

[Tasilee]

TestField	Value
GUID	4daa7986-d9b0-4dd5-ad17-2d7a771ea71a
Label	VALIDATION_STATEPROVINCE_FOUND
Description	Does the value of dwc:stateProvince occur in the bdq:sourceAuthority?
TestType	Validation
Darwin Core Class	dcterms:Location
Information Elements ActedUpon	dwc:stateProvince
Information Elements Consulted
Expected Response	EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available; INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:stateProvince is bdq:Empty; COMPLIANT if the value of dwc:stateProvince occurs as an administrative entity that is a child to at least one entity representing an ISO country-like entity in the bdq:sourceAuthority; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT
Data Quality Dimension	Conformance
Term-Actions	STATEPROVINCE_FOUND
Parameter(s)	bdq:sourceAuthority
Source Authority	bdq:sourceAuthority default = "The Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN)" {[https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/tgn/index.html]}
Specification Last Updated	2023-09-18
Examples	[dwc:stateProvince="Florida": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:stateProvince found in bdq:sourceAuthority"]
	[dwc:stateProvince="Taswegian": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=NOT_COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:stateProvince not found in bdq:sourceAuthority"]
Source	ALA, GBIF
References	Getty Research Institute (2017) Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names Online. https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/tgn/index.html Chapman AD and Wieczorek JR (2020) Georeferencing Best Practices. Copenhagen: GBIF Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.15468/doc-gg7h-s853
Example Implementations (Mechanisms)
Link to Specification Source Code
Notes	Multiple values in the dwc:stateProvince field (whether to signify on a border or in a list of possibilities) will fail this test. This test must return NOT_COMPLIANT if there is leading or trailing whitespace or there are leading or trailing non-printing characters.

[Tasilee]

I used "Tasmanian" in the example as the examples are mainly fails. This is something we need to check for consistency.

[ArthurChapman]

Then I suggest we make it explicit that it "fails the test because ..." See what you have written in #200 and #201.

[Tasilee]

Agreed. Done.

[chicoreus]

Do we want to be explicit about rank (one way or another) in the specification:

Changing

EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available; INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:stateProvince was EMPTY; COMPLIANT if value of dwc:stateProvince occurs in bdq:sourceAuthority; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT

to

EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available; INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:stateProvince was EMPTY; COMPLIANT if value of dwc:stateProvince occurs at any rank below country in bdq:sourceAuthority; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT

or

EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available; INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:stateProvince was EMPTY; COMPLIANT if value of dwc:stateProvince occurs in bdq:sourceAuthority at a rank interpretable as a primary division of a country; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT

or

EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available; INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:stateProvince was EMPTY; COMPLIANT if value of dwc:stateProvince occurs at any rank in bdq:sourceAuthority; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT

[Tasilee]

I prefer the first example (rank below country) or third.

[tucotuco]

I don't think the second one can work in practice. I have an intuition that the third one is too permissive. The first one seems reasonable, but I would state it something like this ("rank" doesn't really work for administrative geography):

EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available; INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:stateProvince is EMPTY; COMPLIANT if the value of dwc:stateProvince occurs as an administrative entity that is a child to at least one of the entities representing an ISO country-like entity in the bdq:sourceAuthority; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT

[Tasilee]

Agreed and amended as suggested with an addition to the Notes to help explain our intent

[chicoreus]

How about a minor change from that s/at least one of the entities/at least one entity/:

EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available; INTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:stateProvince is EMPTY; COMPLIANT if the value of dwc:stateProvince occurs as an administrative entity that is a child to at least one entity representing an ISO country-like entity in the bdq:sourceAuthority; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT

[Tasilee]

Done.

[Tasilee]

Added to Notes: "This test will fail if there are leading or trailing white space or non-printing characters."

[Tasilee]

Post Zoom 11/7/2023, I have aligned the Source Authority with the suggested syntax:

bdq:sourceAuthority default = "The Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN)" [https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/tgn/index.html]

to

bdq:sourceAuthority default = "The Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN)" {[https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/tgn/index.html]}

[Tasilee]

Splitting bdqffdq:Information Elements into "Information Elements ActedUpon" and "Information Elements Consulted".

Also changed "Field" to "TestField", "Output Type" to "TestType" and updated "Specification Last Updated"

[chicoreus]

Edited notes to change "fail" text to more specific "This test must return NOT_COMPLIANT if there is leading or trailing whitespace or there are leading or trailing non-printing characters."