search

tdwg / bdq

Biodiversity Data Quality (BDQ) Interest Group
https://github.com/tdwg/bdq
43 stars 7 forks source link

TG2-VALIDATION_KINGDOM_NOTEMPTY #216

Open Tasilee opened 9 months ago

Tasilee commented 9 months ago
TestField Value
GUID 36ed36c9-b1a7-40b2-b5e2-0d012e772098
Label VALIDATION_KINGDOM_NOTEMPTY
Description Is there a value in dwc:kingdom?
TestType Validation
Darwin Core Class dwc:Taxon
Information Elements ActedUpon dwc:kingdom
Information Elements Consulted
Expected Response COMPLIANT if dwc:kingdom is bdq:NotEmpty; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT
Data Quality Dimension Completeness
Term-Actions KINGDOM_NOTEMPTY
Parameter(s)
Source Authority
Specification Last Updated 2024-01-28
Examples [dwc:kingdom="Fungi": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:kingdom is bdq:NotEmpty"]
[dwc:kingdom="": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=NOT_COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:kingdom is bdq:Empty"]
Source TG2
References
Example Implementations (Mechanisms)
Link to Specification Source Code
Notes
chicoreus commented 8 months ago

This one is reasonable as is, for almost all purposes the absence of a value in dwc:Kingdom indicates a data quality issue.

chicoreus commented 8 months ago

This one could reasonably go into CORE.

Tasilee commented 8 months ago

I bow to others on this. I can see a case for CORE as a VALIDATION (rather than an ISSUE). PLEASE INDICATE - I have added NEEDS WORK for this. The stats are interesting

88% of GBIF records NOTEMPTY 29% of ALA records NOTEMPTY

ArthurChapman commented 8 months ago

I agree to CORE - no one has suggested ISSUE have they? I think @chicoreus was using issue in a generic sense