search

tdwg / bdq

Biodiversity Data Quality (BDQ) Interest Group
https://github.com/tdwg/bdq
43 stars 7 forks source link

TG2-VALIDATION_HIGHERGEOGRAPHY_NOTEMPTY #230

Closed Tasilee closed 9 months ago

Tasilee commented 9 months ago
TestField Value
GUID cfa2c8fd-e778-4f2b-8c16-2221d46e0006
Label VALIDATION_HIGHERGEOGRAPHY_NOTEMPTY
Description Is there a value in dwc:higherGeography?
TestType Validation
Darwin Core Class location
Information Elements ActedUpon dwc:higherGeography
Information Elements Consulted
Expected Response COMPLIANT if dwc:higherGeography is bdq:NotEmpty; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT
Data Quality Dimension Completeness
Term-Actions HIGHERGEOGRAPHY_NOTEMPTY
Parameter(s)
Source Authority
Specification Last Updated 2024-01-29
Examples [dwc:higherGeography="South Pacific Ocean": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:higherGeography is bdq:NotEmpty"]
[dwc:higherGeography="": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=NOT_COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:higherGeography is bdq:Empty"]
Source TG2
References
Example Implementations (Mechanisms)
Link to Specification Source Code
Notes This would belong in core, except we are treating the georeference as the primary terms for locality, and the textual terms as secondary, and dwc:higherGeography is a concatenation of the textual higher geography terms, thus this appropriately falls outside of core.
chicoreus commented 9 months ago

This would belong in core, except we are treating the georeference as the primary terms for locality, and the textual terms as secondary, and dwc:higherGeography is a concatenation of the textual higher geography terms, thus this appropriately falls outside of core.

ArthurChapman commented 9 months ago

Perhaps that should be put in the Notes @chicoreus