Open iDigBioBot opened 6 years ago
TestField | Value |
---|---|
GUID | c486546c-e6e5-48a7-b286-eba7f5ca56c4 |
Label | VALIDATION_OCCURRENCEID_NOTEMPTY |
Description | Is there a value in dwc:occurrenceID? |
TestType | Validation |
Darwin Core Class | dwc:Occurrence |
Information Elements ActedUpon | dwc:occurrenceID |
Information Elements Consulted | |
Expected Response | COMPLIANT if dwc:occurrenceID is bdq:NotEmpty; otherwise NOT_COMPLIANT |
Data Quality Dimension | Completeness |
Term-Actions | OCCURRENCEID_NOTEMPTY |
Parameter(s) | |
Source Authority | |
Specification Last Updated | 2023-09-17 |
Examples | [dwc:occurrenceID="https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/43047701": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:occurrenceID conforms to GUID structure"] |
[dwc:occurrenceID="": Response.status=RUN_HAS_RESULT, Response.result=NOT_COMPLIANT, Response.comment="dwc:occurrenceID is bdq:Empty"] | |
Source | VertNet |
References | |
Example Implementations (Mechanisms) | |
Link to Specification Source Code | |
Notes |
Comment by Lee Belbin (@Tasilee) migrated from spreadsheet: I thought this was against our policy?
Comment by John Wieczorek (@tucotuco) migrated from spreadsheet: This has particular applicability for GBIF in publishing an Occurrence data set.
Comment by Paul Morris (@chicoreus) migrated from spreadsheet: Important for testing data in pre-aggregation phases, and for assessing data collected by researchers from various sources.
Comment by John Wieczorek (@tucotuco) migrated from spreadsheet: I believe the name of this test should be changed. OCCURRENCE_IS_NULL is vague and ambiguous, and does not match names of similar tests. I propose OCCURRENCEID_IS_NULL for consistency.
Splitting bdqffdq:Information Elements into "Information Elements ActedUpon" and "Information Elements Consulted". Also changed "Field" to "TestField" and "Output Type" to "TestType".