search

tdwg / gbwg

Genomic Biodiversity Interest Group
Apache License 2.0
15 stars 2 forks source link

DwC Mapping - MIXS:0000002 samp_collect_device #20

Closed tucotuco closed 3 years ago

tucotuco commented 3 years ago
Field Value
subject_id http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/samplingProtocol
subject_definition The name of, reference to, or description of the method or protocol used during an Event.
subject_usage_notes
subject_examples UV light trap, mist net, bottom trawl, ad hoc observation, point count, Penguins from space: faecal stains reveal the location of emperor penguin colonies, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00467.x, Takats et al. 2001. Guidelines for Nocturnal Owl Monitoring in North America. Beaverhill Bird Observatory and Bird Studies Canada, Edmonton, Alberta. 32 pp., http://www.bsc-eoc.org/download/Owl.pdf
predicate_id skos:broadMatch
object_id MIXS:0000002
object_label samp_collect_device
object definition The method or device employed for collecting the sample
object source https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs-legacy/blob/master/mixs5/mixs_v5.xlsx
comment dwc:samplingProtocol covers both of the concepts samp_collect_device and samp_collect_process.
raissameyer commented 3 years ago

Suggested syntax predicate for the mapping above https://github.com/tdwg/gbwg/issues/20#issue-805169799

Field Value
subject_id http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/samplingProtocol
subject_value_syntax - expected_value - unit
syntax_predicate_id skos:relatedMatch
object_id MIXS:0000002
object_value_syntax - expected_value - unit {text} - type name
syntax_comment DwC expects the name of, reference to, or description (which could also include a URI, IRI, etc.), while MIxS only expects a label
pbuttigieg commented 3 years ago

This is interesting.

both of these terms confound methods and devices (the DwC in its examples, MIxS in its definitions). We should recommend that both standards resolve these into separate terms.

In the meantime we may be looking at a semantic exact match (based on the examples). If the definitions are the only thing we're going on, then a DwC (methods) broadMatch MIxS (methods or devices) would be fine.

raissameyer commented 3 years ago

Noted this also in the comment of our SSSOM mapping matrix

Both of these terms list both, the names of (or links to) methods, or devices (either in the definition or in the examples). Taking the definition and the examples into account these could be skos:exactMatch, focusing only on the definition, skos:broadMatch would be appropriate.