Updated DwC-MIxS mapping

raissameyer commented 2 years ago

This PR and issue in the SSSOM repo showed that - by following the old SSSOM guidance - we have sometimes used the SKOS predicates for narrow match and broad match incorrectly.

In issue #77 we reviewed the mapping predicates.

In this PR we will update our mapping files to fix this.

Updates for v2.0.0 of the mapping

Mapping predicates

value for predicate_id updated to skos:narrowMatch for the terms listed here: https://github.com/tdwg/gbwg/issues/77#issuecomment-995806725
value for predicate_id updated to skos:broadMatch for the terms listed here: https://github.com/tdwg/gbwg/issues/77#issuecomment-995840816
value for syntax_predicate_id updated to skos:broadMatch for the terms listed here: https://github.com/tdwg/gbwg/issues/77#issuecomment-997932073, https://github.com/tdwg/gbwg/issues/77#issuecomment-998646738

Associated metadata

values for mapping_date/syntax_mapping_date and creator_id were updated to reflect the updates in the mapping predicates

Additional metadata

v2.0.0 additionally includes a confidence value confidence/syntax_confidence for the mapping between 0 and 1 (0 no confidence, 1 100% confidence; see The SSSOM 5-Star System For Mappings).

Removed metadata

DwC-MIxS_mappingSemantic-2.0.0.sssom.tsv no longer includes the additional column on predicate_label as there was no clear guidance on what those are for skos:narrowMatch and skos:broadMatch.

pbuttigieg commented 2 years ago

The review of the semantic mapping (following the update of the SSSOM guidance and @raissameyer's implementation thereof) is done above.

You'll notice that this was done in a line-by-line fashion as we think this should be the norm for a mapping file that links standards organisations: very thorough, with approvals explicit.

raissameyer commented 2 years ago

Thank you for the in depth review @pbuttigieg. I have addressed the comments as discussed, and updated the semantic and syntactic mapping file accordingly.

Please let me know if there are any further comments that should be addressed, otherwise I'll go ahead and also update the Support mapping file to reflect the changes in the semantic and syntactic mapping - which should be the final step in this PR.

tdwg / gbwg