Closed timrobertson100 closed 10 months ago
The following is personal opinion. I think it was a mistake to mint the recordedByID and identifiedByID terms for the simple reason that terms already existed in the dwciri: namespace (dwciri:recordedBy and dwciri:identifiedBy) for the purpose these were minted. The only differences are that the newly minted terms reside in the dwc: namespace and parallel the original non-ID terms in allowing a list of identifiers. I wouldn't want to see the same proliferation happen again without very good cause.
The ecoiri: equivalents of eco:identifiedBy and eco:samplingPerformedBy will be created automatically if these two terms are ratified.
Thanks, @tucotuco - that answers the question clearly, so I'll close this. I think there are implications for the implementations (e.g. DwC-A schemas and GBIF IPT) but that discussion can be had on those repositories.
There has been a lot of interest in disambiguating the person names in the various DwC terms over the last few years. Were
identifiedByID
andsamplingPerformedByID
considered for inclusion with HC, please?