kingenloff
commented
8 months ago New term recommended by the Humboldt Extension Task Group so as to be consistent and separate the value and unit into two terms for all applicable fields. Here the proposed term being split is geospatialScopeAreaInSquareKilometers (https://github.com/tdwg/hc/issues/32).
Submitter: Humboldt Extension Task Group Efficacy Justification (why is this term necessary?): Part of a package of terms in support of biological inventory data. Demand Justification (name at least two organizations that independently need this term): The Humboldt Extension Task Group proposing this term consists of numerous organizations. Stability Justification (what concerns are there that this might affect existing implementations?): None Implications for dwciri: namespace (does this change affect a dwciri term version)?: None Proposed attributes of the new term:
Term name (in lowerCamelCase for properties, UpperCamelCase for classes): geospatialScopeAreaUnit Term label (English, not normative): Geospatial Scope Area Unit Organized in Class (e.g., Occurrence, Event, Location, Taxon): Event Definition of the term (normative): The units associated with eco:geospatialScopeAreaValue. Usage comments (recommendations regarding content, etc., not normative): Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary. Examples (not normative): km Refines (identifier of the broader term this term refines; normative): None Replaces (identifier of the existing term that would be deprecated and replaced by this term; normative): None ABCD 2.06 (XPATH of the equivalent term in ABCD or EFG; not normative): not in ABCD