Closed peterdesmet closed 9 years ago
Seems ok to me
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Peter Desmet notifications@github.com wrote:
Each time I move a standard to Github, I create a specific GitHub team to manage the standard (with admin access). I'd like to be consistent in naming these teams. So far I have (full list https://github.com/orgs/tdwg/teams):
team | repo @owners | all @conferences | conferences @exec | exec @infrastructure | tdwg.org @prior-standards | prior-standards @audubon-core | ac @darwin-core | dwc @guid | guid-as @ncd | ncd @vocab | vocab
Does anyone have an objection if rename the audubon-core team to ac and darwin-core to dwc so they can be @mention https://github.com/blog/821 ed as such?
/cc @tdwg/exec https://github.com/orgs/tdwg/teams/exec @tdwg/audubon-core https://github.com/orgs/tdwg/teams/audubon-core @tdwg/darwin-core https://github.com/orgs/tdwg/teams/darwin-core (this is an example of how you can ping specific teams)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/tdwg/tdwg.org/issues/14.
Robert A. Morris
Emeritus Professor of Computer Science UMASS-Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd Boston, MA 02125-3390
Filtered Push Project Harvard University Herbaria Harvard University
email: morris.bob@gmail.com web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/ web: http://wiki.filteredpush.org http://wiki.datakurator.net http://taxonconceptexplorer.org/ http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
Good idea.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Bob Morris notifications@github.com wrote:
Seems ok to me
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Peter Desmet notifications@github.com wrote:
Each time I move a standard to Github, I create a specific GitHub team to manage the standard (with admin access). I'd like to be consistent in naming these teams. So far I have (full list https://github.com/orgs/tdwg/teams):
team | repo @owners | all @conferences | conferences @exec | exec @infrastructure | tdwg.org @prior-standards | prior-standards @audubon-core | ac @darwin-core | dwc @guid | guid-as @ncd | ncd @vocab | vocab
Does anyone have an objection if rename the audubon-core team to ac and darwin-core to dwc so they can be @mention https://github.com/blog/821 ed as such?
/cc @tdwg/exec https://github.com/orgs/tdwg/teams/exec @tdwg/audubon-core https://github.com/orgs/tdwg/teams/audubon-core @tdwg/darwin-core https://github.com/orgs/tdwg/teams/darwin-core (this is an example of how you can ping specific teams)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/tdwg/tdwg.org/issues/14.
Robert A. Morris
Emeritus Professor of Computer Science UMASS-Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd Boston, MA 02125-3390
Filtered Push Project Harvard University Herbaria Harvard University
email: morris.bob@gmail.com web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/ web: http://wiki.filteredpush.org http://wiki.datakurator.net http://taxonconceptexplorer.org/ http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/tdwg/tdwg.org/issues/14#issuecomment-107212975.
Thanks, it's done: https://github.com/orgs/tdwg/teams
Each time I move a standard to Github, I create a specific GitHub team to manage the standard (with admin access). I'd like to be consistent in naming these teams. So far I have (full list):
Does anyone have an objection if rename the
audubon-core
team toac
anddarwin-core
todwc
so they can be @mention ed as such?/cc @tdwg/exec @tdwg/audubon-core @tdwg/darwin-core (this is an example of how you can ping specific teams)