Closed peterdesmet closed 9 years ago
Blocks:
Affects:
Hi I would be in favor of a citation format where TDWG is of course mentioned, but also the names of the co-authors (but as those may vary in time, has to keep updated). Walso need some flexibility as some journals have standard citation formats rules.
in some cases additional to the citation only, you may have to add a request to acknowledge other contributing institutions or funding bodies (who request this in many cases)
More generally you may want to add some information on using the logo(s) and in which context.
Suggestion: use Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) as the publisher.
Provide a bibtex formatted text file.
Need to resolve in the next few days.
Deadline: July 2
Hi For online content citations date accessed is a standard request from many journals and others. Would thus recommend we suggest to have it as it is a best practice advise.
Since the citation indicates the release date, a date accessed
doesn't provide much more information, so I would not include this.
yes that is what I meant not to put in in the citation example.
but if room, indicated that some journals request it in an additional sentence . but that is my "helpdesk" side.
I see. :smile: As discussed in the call, it's a preferred citation. A journal will probably have other requirements regarding the format, but at least we indicate what we would like to have in there.
@peterdesmet Following today's XC meeting, please find below an example bib record for the Darwin Core Standard. I set the reference type to 'misc' as no other type seems to match for referencing a Standard. I also chose to add the release date to the 'edition' field. Any reference manager software can parse this and deliver a citation format according to any common format.
@misc {DarwinCore2014, title = {Darwin Core}, year = {2014}, publisher = {Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)}, edition = {Release 2014-11-08}, url = {http://www.tdwg.org/standards/450}, author = {Wieczorek, John and D{\"o}ring, Markus and De Giovanni, Renato and Robertson, Tim and Vieglais, Dave and Desmet, Peter} }
Is there anything left to do on this @peterdesmet ?
Sorry to have missed the conversations in the meeting(s), so hope this doesn't re-open/duplicate debate.
The initial question was around a preferred citation format, but that now seems to have translated into the preferred fields that should be included in the bibliographic information. Was discussion still given to providing a recommended citation format so there is consistency across TDWG standards? (I still see some value in this).
If yes, then the format of the author string seems rather non-standard for a citation (appropriate for content). It is more typical for multiple authors to be separated by semi-colons or commas in a citation.
I'd like to close this discussion. To keep things simple, I'll add Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)
as a publisher to the preferred citation. The preferred citation will be indicated as a blockquote at the end of the README file of a standard, but I will not add a bibtex to the repository (because then we need to maintain two files). So, an example of a preferred citation is:
Wieczorek John, Döring Markus, De Giovanni Renato, Robertson Tim, Vieglais Dave, Desmet Peter. 2014. Darwin Core, Version 2014-11-08. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) http://www.tdwg.org/standards/450
And if the authors are not readily known, I'll use the task group as the author (can be updated later):
Access to Biological Collections Data task group. 2007. Access to Biological Collection Data (ABCD), Version 2.06. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) http://www.tdwg.org/standards/115
Updated to use the word version
instead of release
(as suggested by @timrobertson100)
As outlined in this guidelines document, we will add a preferred citation for each standard in the README. The preferred citation (with updated release number and year) can also be listed for each release. This citation should at least include:
and preferably:
and maybe:
It would be convenient if we can decide on a standard format for this preferred citation, which I can then include in the guidelines document and which I'll add to every README and release on GitHub.
My suggestion
For example:
New versions can have more authors.
Other suggestions
By @baskaufs in this comment:
By @ramorrismorris in this comment:
Currently listed for Darwin Core:
Listed in a Darwin Core release:
Suggested for LSID applicability statement:
Please comment on how we should format this, including punctuation (e.g. between names and for year).
/cc @tdwg/exec