I'm listing here some discussions and issues that I believe that are related to the species interaction topics.
Few people who are participating on this IG have also participated on this discussions in the past. So the ideia here is to give a update on this topics and let new members to know about what have been proposed in the past and why.
Change term - associatedTaxa (added recommendation to use dwc:ResourceRealtionship class and clarifies its usage): https://github.com/tdwg/dwc/issues/331
Change term - associatedOrganisms (added recommendation to use dwc:ResourceRealtionship class and clarifies its usage): https://github.com/tdwg/dwc/issues/330
From all these discussion above, it look to me that the community is moving in the direction to adopt dwc:ResourceRelationship class a pattern to share associations between records.
So, should interactions go in the same direction? It brings some thoughts to me:
What we are trying to do here?
What is the problem with dwc:ResourceRelationship for share biotic interactions?
If there is no problem with Resource Relat, then, does this class fit the needs to share basic information about biotic interactions (Ainteraction_typeB)?
What more do we need for biotic interactions beyond of identifiers (A and B) and a interaction type?
Hi folks,
I'm listing here some discussions and issues that I believe that are related to the species interaction topics. Few people who are participating on this IG have also participated on this discussions in the past. So the ideia here is to give a update on this topics and let new members to know about what have been proposed in the past and why.
dwc:ResourceRealtionshipclass to term comments!)https://github.com/tdwg/dwc/issues/332dwc:ResourceRealtionshipclass and clarifies its usage): https://github.com/tdwg/dwc/issues/331dwc:ResourceRealtionshipclass and clarifies its usage): https://github.com/tdwg/dwc/issues/330From all these discussion above, it look to me that the community is moving in the direction to adopt
dwc:ResourceRelationshipclass a pattern to share associations between records.So, should interactions go in the same direction? It brings some thoughts to me:
dwc:ResourceRelationshipfor share biotic interactions?interaction_typeB)?Interesting to know what people think about it.