Open nielsklazenga opened 3 years ago
"(essentially) identical" is in my view not a helpful set of adjectives in this context. A key case where "is congruent with" has to work is when there are two published taxonomic concepts, each (in the simplest case) referencing only one of two diagnostic or synapomorphic traits (angiosperms sec. A have flowers; angiosperms sec. B have triploid endosperm). The circumscriptions in these cases need not be essentially identical. They need to be coextensional; where extension is the entire set of the things to which the concept applies.
isCongruentWith (controlled term)
Mapping