tdwg / website

TDWG website
https://www.tdwg.org
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
16 stars 55 forks source link

Migrate TDWG site to new logo and brand #462

Closed timrobertson100 closed 1 year ago

timrobertson100 commented 1 year ago

TDWG presented a new brand at the 2022 conference. The site should be migrated. Contributions are most welcome.

peterdesmet commented 1 year ago

Working on it 👌

peterdesmet commented 1 year ago

This is a version with only the green and blue. The green makes links hard to read in text, so they need to be underlined:

Standards-TDWG (1)


Darwin-Core-quick-reference-guide-Darwin-Core (1)

peterdesmet commented 1 year ago

Alternatively, we use a brighter (closer to original orange) colour for the links, which then don't require underline:

Standards-TDWG (2)


Darwin-Core-quick-reference-guide-Darwin-Core (2)

peterdesmet commented 1 year ago

Feedback welcome

stanblum commented 1 year ago

I like the orange on linked text -- enhanced contrast improves readability! Does it work (improve readability) for people with impaired color perception?

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 5:22 AM Peter Desmet @.***> wrote:

Feedback welcome

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/tdwg/website/issues/462#issuecomment-1282298367, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACKZUDOSJWIJMRPJAVLFAWLWD2JATANCNFSM6AAAAAARH3INEU . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

peterdesmet commented 1 year ago

I have tested the green link and orange link versions on https://pilestone.com/pages/color-blindness-simulator-1# and both work fine.

Note that adding orange to the mix makes it a bit more challenging to have a consistent theme though. 😄

peterdesmet commented 1 year ago

I've also experimented with an another theme. Here I have not underlined the green links, do you find them unreadable?

Darwin-Core-TDWG (2)

stanblum commented 1 year ago

Thanks, Peter!

The green links on white are very readable. I think the green links on a dark background (e.g., over the banner image at the top) were hard to read. Would you be inclined to washout (de-contrast) the banner image?

Curious to hear what others think of all these options.

-Stan

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:02 AM Peter Desmet @.***> wrote:

I've also experimented with an another theme. Here I have not underlined the green links, how unreadable are they?

[image: Darwin-Core-TDWG (2)] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/600993/196878687-d2bbd180-d85a-47b6-bc09-c1d76ff7c174.png

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/tdwg/website/issues/462#issuecomment-1285042229, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACKZUDPUSDWESKUFLC75UMDWEDVBVANCNFSM6AAAAAARH3INEU . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

peterdesmet commented 1 year ago

Ah, if you think the green on white (in regular text) works fine, then it's fairly easy to use another approach in the theme for links on dark. I suggest white underline for those:

Darwin-Core-TDWG (3)

The advantage is that we don't have to introduce orange then.

WUlate commented 1 year ago

I'm all for washout the background and leave the colors as they were.I'd say these images are too dark and taking prese(de)nce from our content. Regards, William. On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 10:08:39 AM GMT+3, Stan Blum @.***> wrote:

Thanks, Peter!

The green links on white are very readable. I think the green links on a dark background (e.g., over the banner image at the top) were hard to read. Would you be inclined to washout (de-contrast) the banner image?

Curious to hear what others think of all these options.

-Stan

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:02 AM Peter Desmet @.***> wrote:

I've also experimented with an another theme. Here I have not underlined the green links, how unreadable are they?

[image: Darwin-Core-TDWG (2)] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/600993/196878687-d2bbd180-d85a-47b6-bc09-c1d76ff7c174.png

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/tdwg/website/issues/462#issuecomment-1285042229, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACKZUDPUSDWESKUFLC75UMDWEDVBVANCNFSM6AAAAAARH3INEU . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

mhirschfeld commented 1 year ago

I would also like to stick to blue and green only when possible and wash out colors where needed!

gkampmeier commented 1 year ago

@peterdesmet where you have the DwC website button in dark green with black text, you could try white text, as the reverse of the GitHub button, and it would make that more readable. Saturating or desaturating colors to provide contrast helps. BTW, I find orange (and worse, red) text very hard to read, even though the contrast stands out. I hope we can find a compromise as @mhirschfeld indicates that would work.

peterdesmet commented 1 year ago

@gkampmeier thanks for the input. Seems like the consensus is to go with new green and blue 👍. White vs black text on the buttons is automatically detected. Apparently the new TDWG green (#709147) is right on the cusp to show black text (which I still find readable), while a slightly darker green (#617E3E) switches to white text.

Here's a new version with that green and a washed out banner (as in the original website), as suggested by @mhirschfeld (and addressing the dark images comment by @WUlate). I think this works well.

Darwin-Core-TDWG