Closed mingodad closed 2 years ago
Trying to write an alternative parser for tl I found a possible bug on https://github.com/teal-language/tl/blob/ef4fcda5ba0a0c83d2a4dbfac67baf186e8c4252/tl.tl#L46 we have as field of a record but on https://github.com/teal-language/tl/blob/ef4fcda5ba0a0c83d2a4dbfac67baf186e8c4252/tl.tl#L54 and https://github.com/teal-language/tl/blob/ef4fcda5ba0a0c83d2a4dbfac67baf186e8c4252/tl.tl#L1201 we have type as field name for another record.
tl
type
This makes difficult to parse because type seems to be a keyword that also is valid inside a record for type declaration like here https://github.com/teal-language/tl/blob/ef4fcda5ba0a0c83d2a4dbfac67baf186e8c4252/tl.tl#L10 inside local record tl.
local record tl
Is this intended or a bug ?
Trying to write an alternative parser for
tlI found a possible bug on https://github.com/teal-language/tl/blob/ef4fcda5ba0a0c83d2a4dbfac67baf186e8c4252/tl.tl#L46 we have as field of a record but on https://github.com/teal-language/tl/blob/ef4fcda5ba0a0c83d2a4dbfac67baf186e8c4252/tl.tl#L54 and https://github.com/teal-language/tl/blob/ef4fcda5ba0a0c83d2a4dbfac67baf186e8c4252/tl.tl#L1201 we havetypeas field name for another record.This makes difficult to parse because
typeseems to be a keyword that also is valid inside a record for type declaration like here https://github.com/teal-language/tl/blob/ef4fcda5ba0a0c83d2a4dbfac67baf186e8c4252/tl.tl#L10 insidelocal record tl.Is this intended or a bug ?