teasame / webp

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/webp
0 stars 0 forks source link

Pre-compiled OS X 10.5 binaries are not compiled for ppc #104

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Download libwebp-0.1.3-mac-10.5.tar.gz
2. Examine contents with "lipo -info"

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected software for 10.5 to be compiled 32-bit, for both Intel and PowerPC, 
but your webp binaries are compiled for 64-bit Intel only. This would cause 
problems for anyone trying to use your binaries on 10.5 with the default build 
architectures.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
webp 0.1.3, OS X 10.5

Please provide any additional information below.
The default build architecture on OS X 10.5 and earlier is 32-bit. It wasn't 
until OS X 10.6 that the default build architecture changed to x86_64. Ideally 
for OS X 10.5 you would distribute a 3-way universal binary built for i386, 
x86_64, and ppc; if you can do that, you may as well add the 4th architecture 
ppc64 as well.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ryandesi...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2012 at 2:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The x86_64 only is just a side-effect of using the same 10.6 build machine with 
similar flags. It should be easy enough to address i386. I'll have to look into 
ppc.

Original comment by jz...@google.com on 13 Jan 2012 at 11:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Updated the 10.5 archive to contain i386/x86_64 universal binaries, 
libwebp-0.1.3-mac-10.5-2.tar.gz.
PPC is as of yet untested.

Original comment by jz...@google.com on 30 Jan 2012 at 10:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by jz...@google.com on 22 Feb 2012 at 6:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I no longer have the setup to provide 10.5 binaries at all; this will have to 
be done through a build based on the released source archive on the user side.

Original comment by jz...@google.com on 3 Apr 2013 at 6:51