Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I disagree. this works fine for JPG2000. Losless compression is a way to
ensure that this can be used for applications like cameras, compression of
broadcast content, etc.
Original comment by justinjo...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2013 at 3:02
Lossy and loss-less have very different use-cases. The fact it works in
JPEG2000 doesn't mean it's successful.
Please consider that this is not only confusing but also leads to incomplete
implementations which would handle subset of the format causing even more
frustration. This is ok for container format but not for encoding format.
Keep it robust and small and serve single purpose well. If fractal compression
becomes mainstream in 10 years will you extend the format? I would rather see a
new one, otherwise it will grow like a cancer (adding is simple, removing is
not).
Original comment by mieli...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2013 at 4:50
jpeg also has different possible sub-features (like, arithmetic coding,
lossless, rgb or yuv444, etc!).
These features are an encoder's choice, not a decoder one (which must support
any of these anyway).
Actually, from the decoder standpoint, one don't have to know which exact
features are used underneath
a bitstream. Having one call to decode an bitstream is handy, no question asked.
Original comment by pascal.m...@gmail.com
on 29 Jan 2014 at 9:17
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mieli...@gmail.com
on 17 Mar 2013 at 6:25