Research - revise names listed in required inputs and soil tabs?

[DerekCaelin]

Currently we use the same name for inputs on the required inputs list and the inputs listed on the soil tab. Is the use of the word "Soil" redundant in the context of the soil tab? Should we name things differently on the required data inputs list and the soil tab? EG ("Soil Color" on required data inputs and "Color" on the soils tab).

Conclusion

• maintain the use of "Soil", even if redundant.

Acceptance Criteria

• [x] reflect on current design and decide whether an update is requred

  (If so, Derek will create a user story to update the designs and implement the new designs).

[CourtneyLee333]

@DerekCaelin The redundancy doesn't bother me, and I'd say there is a decent case for the word "soil" being helpful in this context. Since it's already implemented with one string for each input that gets pulled in the various places, let's leave it until we have a good reason to make a change. I like consistency.

[DerekCaelin]

Sounds good to me. FYI @paulschreiber

[DerekCaelin]

Courtney, re: this issue: https://github.com/techmatters/terraso-mobile-client/issues/2225

Should we call the Soil Texture observation Soil Texture Class?

[CourtneyLee333]

That seems like a decision for engineering to make. I don't think we will have another texture input in the future (plant texture?) so it should be obvious in the code that it is soil texture. If they want to change to keep us on the same page, cool cool.