Closed bdsoha closed 2 months ago
@timothystewart6 It would be great to receive your input on whether or not such a PR is in the roadmap for this project. If so, I will continue the work for all other roles.
@timothystewart6 Did you have a chance to look at this?
@timothystewart6 Did you have a chance to look at this?
Hi! Yes, this sounds great as long as we don't break how it currently works. Unfortunately CI isn't working right now but I hope to have it working soon so that the tests will run!
Thanks! Tim
Just let me know when this is ready!
No problem, I will change the PR status from draft to ready.
@timothystewart6 Ready for review!
@bdsoha it seems this is failing CI
see logs: https://github.com/techno-tim/k3s-ansible/actions/runs/10134226628/job/28020331172
seems like you are mixing snake_case
and camelCase
. I would just make them all snake_case
and one small conflict after all the merges
@timothystewart6 I didn't choose the variable names, just used the existing ones (which might cause regression failures for users of the playbook). Therefore, I added ignore statements to the relevant lines.
pre-commit
is passing locally for me.
Well they were only in a template before now they are set as defaults and used elsewhere. I think you maybe have missed some ignores. There are also conflicts too. Although it does work locally, you might be on a different version? It does need to pass CI since it's the source of truth.
@timothystewart6 You are referring to a CI run from a previous commit (before I added the ignore statements). There is no CI run for the most recent commit which resolves the issues.
The most recent commit is "requires approval from a maintainer"
.
@bdsoha sorry! Good call! There are still conflict though however
@timothystewart6 Done!
Unfortunately it's not passing CI
Proposed Changes
all.yml
file.Checklist
site.yml
playbookreset.yml
playbook