Open Schroedingersdoraemon opened 1 year ago
Dear teddysun,
I am using btrfs with subvolumes:
$ btrfs subvolume list / ID 256 gen 1430873 top level 5 path @ ID 257 gen 1430873 top level 5 path @home
The disk_total_size in the script will seemingly calculate the sum of all the subvolumes, producing a multiplied and redundant result.
$ lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS sda 8:0 0 119.2G 0 disk └─sda1 8:1 0 119.2G 0 part /var/lib/libvirt/images nvme0n1 259:0 0 476.9G 0 disk ├─nvme0n1p1 259:1 0 128M 0 part /boot ├─nvme0n1p2 259:2 0 8G 0 part └─nvme0n1p3 259:3 0 468.8G 0 part /home /
$ df -t simfs -t ext2 -t ext3 -t ext4 -t btrfs -t xfs -t vfat -t ntfs -t swap --total -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/nvme0n1p3 469G 360G 107G 78% / /dev/nvme0n1p1 127M 73M 54M 58% /boot /dev/nvme0n1p3 469G 360G 107G 78% /home /dev/sda1 117G 106G 5.7G 95% /var/lib/libvirt/images total 1.1T 826G 219G 80% -
The correct answer should be 117 G + 469G + 127M $\approx$ 586 G, whilist here the unnecessary addition of a subvolume of 469G was added, the result became 586 G + 469 G $\approx$ 1.1 T
Dear teddysun,
I am using btrfs with subvolumes:
The disk_total_size in the script will seemingly calculate the sum of all the subvolumes, producing a multiplied and redundant result.
The correct answer should be 117 G + 469G + 127M $\approx$ 586 G, whilist here the unnecessary addition of a subvolume of 469G was added, the result became 586 G + 469 G $\approx$ 1.1 T