Closed natcl closed 7 years ago
As long as it's optional (for the user), clean coded, keeping other users implementation intact and not adding limitations I'm fine with it.
Despite that: What's your motivation to keep track of the UDP packets timing?
no response -> closing
Oops sorry for the late answer. The motivation is to record OSC and Artnet packets which can sometimes arrive at intervals < 1ms
I want to record data coming over UDP that is sent quite fast (below one millisecond between packets) and I'd be curious to try using the nanotimer library to gain more precision. Would you eventually be interested by a pull request that would add that mode ?