Add Blockly Editor for Doppler Files

[thebrandonlucas]

https://github.com/tee8z/doppler/assets/38222767/fd5a374d-e5f5-4614-87c5-6baa24ef68c6

Future work:

• Syntax parsing so we can throw errors on invalid doppler files
• Don't allow blocks which don't make sense to pair together to pair (i.e., BITCOIND in a loop)
• Graph of the network that will be generated by Doppler

[tee8z]

This is a great idea and looks look a solid start! Another suggestion is to simplify the language on the blocks or to add symbols to them, since we're adding another layer we can use this to abstract away more of the complexity from the user unless they want to deal with it.

[thebrandonlucas]

This is a great idea and looks look a solid start! Another suggestion is to simplify the language on the blocks or to add symbols to them, since we're adding another layer we can use this to abstract away more of the complexity from the user unless they want to deal with it.

Definitely agree! Will look at simplifying in the next PR. There are also other ways we can do this if we want further clarity. We could add "fields" that make it clearer but a bit more cumbersome to use. For example, we could have them look like below, which is probably better for clarity but a bit more cumbersome to use if you already know what you're doing. We could do either of these styles below as alternatives, let me know which you prefer:

Also, I don't have permissions to merge this PR so feel free to merge if you think it's ready!

[tee8z]

This is a great idea and looks look a solid start! Another suggestion is to simplify the language on the blocks or to add symbols to them, since we're adding another layer we can use this to abstract away more of the complexity from the user unless they want to deal with it.

Definitely agree! Will look at simplifying in the next PR. There are also other ways we can do this if we want further clarity. We could add "fields" that make it clearer but a bit more cumbersome to use. For example, we could have them look like below, which is probably better for clarity but a bit more cumbersome to use if you already know what you're doing. We could do either of these styles below as alternatives, let me know which you prefer:

Also, I don't have permissions to merge this PR so feel free to merge if you think it's ready!

I think I like the first style more than the long line one, but feel free to play around and see what feels easier to use, willing to be wrong.