teel / stasiscl

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/stasiscl
0 stars 0 forks source link

Void combat reports #104

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Hello, every now and then i'm getting reports of fights with no damage 
going on at all, probably when something just triggers combat but doesnt 
engage boss, can't really say what causes it, anyway, could there be an 
option (probably as default even) to filter out fights with zero raid dps?

Here's an example(i'll try to keep it there for a few weeks:P): 
http://server.valhalla-team.com/sws/sws-sapphiron-1234112677/
index.html#damage_out

The commans i use for parsing is `LANG=EN ./stasis add -dir /mnt/sdb1/WoW-
utils/stasiscl/sws -ver 2 -attempt -file $1`

Original issue reported on code.google.com by vana.ondrej on 16 Feb 2009 at 12:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Copied from quick start:
"If you wish to remove a parse, just remove the directory sws-XXXXX and re-run 
perl stasis history with the 
appropriate -dir option."

Original comment by Bik...@gmail.com on 19 Feb 2009 at 7:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I know i can remove a parse, anyway it still is some weird bug, and shouldn't 
be all 
that hard to fix (if i only knew perl a little), it gets annoying when i parse 
many 
combat logs to see some stats of how we improved over a while, and seeing lots 
of 
attempts there when sometimes half of them is without any data. 

Original comment by vana.ondrej on 19 Feb 2009 at 10:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Seems like a worthwhile addition. I'll look into adding something like 
'-mindamage' so you can do '-mindamage 
10000' or whatever.

Original comment by gianmerlino@gmail.com on 6 Mar 2009 at 3:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
In the meantime, by the way, you can do something like -minlength 60 to filter 
out "short" fights (less than a 
minute).

Original comment by gianmerlino@gmail.com on 20 Apr 2009 at 7:18