Per-file license / copyright header is inconsistent with overall repo license

[mbrukman]

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice.

First of all, thank you for open sourcing and sharing this project with us!

I wanted to point out that while your project repo is MIT-licensed, the per-file copyright header licenses are in conflict with that, as they say, e.g.:

https://github.com/tegonhq/tegon/blob/158b54af8d6f7cf4195c615510976b6025baef13/server/src/main.ts#L1

"All rights reserved" is very different from the MIT license.

---

For consistency, each file should have the MIT license at the top, e.g., in your case that would be something like:

// Copyright (c) 2024 Tegon
//
// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
// of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
// in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
// to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
// copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
// furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
//
// The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
// all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
//
// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
// IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
// AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
// LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
// OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
// SOFTWARE.

[tegon-bot[bot]]

ENG-328 Per-file license / copyright header is inconsistent with overall repo license

[harshithmullapudi]

We fixed this and removed the file-based license.