Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Issue 383 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by zundel@google.com
on 9 Jun 2010 at 1:24
Yes please add them. It will ease a lot the usage of gwt in mavenized projects.
For exemple gwt-gadgets-1.2.0 aren't yet available.
Original comment by aheritier
on 4 Aug 2010 at 1:08
When is this going to be fixed. This issue (which is rather simple to fix) has
been hanging for some time.
Original comment by felixnut...@gmail.com
on 15 Dec 2010 at 2:18
Please update the central repo with the latest libraries.
Original comment by croydondias
on 20 May 2011 at 6:52
I'm surprised to see this isn't resolved yet. Is there a reason why the newer
versions aren't in the maven repository?
Original comment by mail.ber...@gmail.com
on 18 Jul 2011 at 2:09
This is rather unusual. Do we have plans to make this available in Maven? I
know there are not that many maven users but please be good Maven citizens and
deploy this to maven central.
Original comment by misra.abby@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2011 at 2:39
FYI, for there's a small typo in the mvn:install -
-Dpackaging=jar should be
-Dpackaging=jar \
Original comment by sanj2s...@gmail.com
on 5 Nov 2011 at 6:39
I'm looking for 1.2.1 but I don't see it in public repositories.
Original comment by kyoke...@gmail.com
on 21 Aug 2012 at 5:47
I can't believe that a such project looks dead!
Is it obsolete? deprecated?
What's happened?
Original comment by boboss74
on 24 Sep 2012 at 4:29
Attachments:
Looks to me like Google abandons gwt!
Original comment by shpand...@gmail.com
on 24 Sep 2012 at 5:04
Hard to say.
Ray Cromwell (gwt project leader, publishing on g+) says that it will be
difficult to abandon GWT. Google ads use GWT (more than 95% of revenues)
Original comment by mathieu....@gmail.com
on 24 Sep 2012 at 6:04
It seems that Dart is the future of GWT...
https://plus.google.com/117487419861992917007/posts/6YWpsHpqMqZ
Original comment by boboss74
on 25 Sep 2012 at 8:21
The only way is local repository
Original comment by theasp...@gmail.com
on 22 Oct 2012 at 8:24
Yes, using an other (not necessarily local) repository is a solution...
But this is not fair...
Original comment by boboss74
on 22 Oct 2012 at 8:49
Booooooooooooo
Original comment by shpand...@gmail.com
on 22 Oct 2012 at 9:00
The method by which you can draw attention to the issue is to vote for it. I
doubt anyone owns this issue and that these projects are active.
WORKAROUND:
For those who don't host a repository (like nexus or archiva) look at using the
project scm as repo. Brett Porter has an excellent blog post on the subject
(includes warnings about best practices) :
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/a-maven-friendly-pattern-for-storing
-dependencies-in-version-control/
p.s. Booooooo++;
:)
Original comment by ahhug...@gmail.com
on 22 Oct 2012 at 10:25
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jgon...@gmail.com
on 2 Jun 2010 at 11:45