Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
We already have event based queuing! :)
Take a look at the plugin config options for SJQ... you can queue tasks for
RecordingStarted, MediaFileImported and SystemMessagePosted events. Also, you
can specify tasks to queue on a per favourite basis (that's what we attach task
ids to favs for). You can also attach task ids to manual recordings.
Attaching tasks to favs or manual recs only queue those tasks on the
RecordingStarted event for that specific fav/man recording.
Everything I describe above should be working, if it's not then open tickets
for specific issues.
I'm waiting for public beta testing to get a feel for what other events users
are wanting to attach tasks to. Adding support for any/all events in the SJQ
engine is rather trivial - the real work is in the STV. I didn't want to
overload you with all kinds of events to handle. We handle what I call "the
big three" already (recording started, media imported, system message posted).
User feedback will determine how many more we add support for.
Original comment by de...@battams.ca
on 7 Nov 2010 at 3:30
I saw those settings in the config options and I guess it never sunk in :(
Personally, I'd like to see all possible SageEvents handled. We could start by
providing the simple list interface you already have in the config options. To
avoid clutter in the options maybe you could make them "advanced options" that
only get displayed if the user enables that. (That's what I do in
CommercialDetector.)
I can start working on a more user friendly interface and see if we can get it
done in time for the public beta. The STV code will not be too hard to do. I
imagine it working like this:
A dialog appears listing all registered tasks. Clicking on one of the tasks
pops up another dialog that lets the user pick what events will fire that task.
So if the user wants to "view by event" they go to the plugin config options
and use the list format you already have. If they want to "view by task" they
use the option from the main menu.
Original comment by tom.mira...@gmail.com
on 7 Nov 2010 at 10:50
Hey, if you're willing/wanting to add this level of support to the STVi then
I'm definitely more than willing to make the necessary code changes in the
engine to support it. :)
If we're going to allow selecting of specific events then basically we're going
to have to change what we do now. Now, we just use the generic property
"SJQ4_TASKS". We'll have to change this to specific props like
"SJQ4_RecordingStarted", "SJQ4_RecordingCompleted", "SJQ4_RecordingStopped",
"SJQ4_<eventName>", etc. and each time an event occurs SJQ will lookup the
specific event property of the favourite and queue those tasks.
This is a little bit of work for me, but not much and all rather trivial. If
you want to tackle the STVi portion then I'll definitely make the engine
changes. So the fate of this ticket it really up to you. :)
Original comment by de...@battams.ca
on 7 Nov 2010 at 1:24
Let's give it a try. If we don't get it working in time for the public beta
we'll delay it.
Just to be clear, for this ticket I'm talking about tasks that do NOT relate to
specific sage Objects. The other ticket was the one that dealt with specific
Favorites.
Original comment by tom.mira...@gmail.com
on 7 Nov 2010 at 1:30
One more thought. Please provide an API that supplies me with a list of
SageEvents that you will support. I don't want to make the assumptions in the
STV and hardcode all of the SageEvents.
Original comment by tom.mira...@gmail.com
on 7 Nov 2010 at 1:47
public String[] getSupportedEvents();
That is a String[] containing the list of all events the engine is currently
listening for. This method is available in DataStore for the next build.
Original comment by de...@battams.ca
on 7 Nov 2010 at 2:34
Nice. Also let me know what method to use to associate a Task with one of
these events. I imagine it will be something like:
addTaskToEvent(Task, Event)
The STV code for this is actually very easy - I have most of it written already.
Original comment by tom.mira...@gmail.com
on 7 Nov 2010 at 2:48
Hmm... now I'm not so sure we're on the same page. :) How/where do you plan to
put this in the STV? I guess I need you to describe how you're thinking of
supporting this?
Original comment by de...@battams.ca
on 7 Nov 2010 at 3:04
I'll supply you with an updated STV in a few hours, that will make it clear.
Original comment by tom.mira...@gmail.com
on 7 Nov 2010 at 3:13
Included in the 1108 build.
Original comment by tom.mira...@gmail.com
on 9 Nov 2010 at 8:16
Fix verified.
Original comment by de...@battams.ca
on 14 Nov 2010 at 2:53
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
tom.mira...@gmail.com
on 6 Nov 2010 at 8:09