Open mkuts12 opened 8 years ago
@ralesk Fair point. I suggest that up would be used for scrolling and [Ctrl+up] for selecting messages.
Other shortcuts are welcome too if we get something
@ralesk Ctrl-F is currently used to search in messages. i would prefer it to stay that way. but new shortcuts are always welcome specially if we could get a settings section to customize them.
@zumoshi I meant that the application should have a "message selection" mode, where a message will be selected and you can perform actions on it, like replying, forwarding or deleting it. In this mode some shortcuts will work differently, as you would expect. Hence, it is reasonable to remap CTRL-F
Right now we must use the mouse for this and I would like to change it.
Just wanted to say: good point from both of you. I've never so far needed the search feature so it didn't occur to me that it even exists, and indeed [Ctrl+F] is the common way for that. But in message selection mode I guess it's not much of a problem if it's replaced with Forward (or we'll think up another shortcut for that anyway)
Remove Up key for editing and add Ctrl+Up for editing. It's trouble I want to see 3 or 4 message before and replay it, It edit my last message.
Can we do something with it?
I agree with everything here except for shortcuts like just R, E or D. Does no one use the Menu key (right-click keyboard button) anymore? (Wikipedia)
This button is very useful, e.g. use up/down arrows to select something, press Menu key then use up/down arrows to select the option you want.
It'd be great to have some system for selecting messages, then you just press Menu and select the option you want (Reply
, Copy
, Forward
and Select
are currently in pretty much all message context menus)
Not every keyboard has this button. I can say for sure about all apple-related keyboards, but I think also some linux/windows laptops nowadays don't have it.
Hey there!
We're automatically closing this issue since there was no activity in this issue since 361 days ago. We therefore assume that the user has lost interest or resolved the problem on their own. Closed issues that remain inactive for a long period may get automatically locked.
Don't worry though; if this is in error, let us know with a comment and we'll be happy to reopen the issue.
Thanks!
(Please note that this is an automated comment.)
Hey there!
This issue will be automatically closed in 7 days if there would be no activity. We therefore assume that the user has lost interest or resolved the problem on their own.
Don't worry though; if this is an error, let us know with a comment and we'll be happy to reopen the issue.
Thanks!
@stek29 Tagging you since you re-opened this last time a bot closed it. The issue is still unsolved and 6 other issues were closed in favor of this one.
It'd be great to have some system for selecting messages
Agreed @Walkman100! Selecting by holding down the mouse works, but could be a lot faster and even be automated with macros if they were also exposed as shortcuts.
I think the biggest pain points are:
I think using the spacebar for toggling message selection could be helpful and intuitive, in combination with the ability to cycle through the message history using arrow keys. Then as a next step one should consider what the standards for file explorers are as that should also be an already learned concept for many people - at least with Shift modifier for "select until here". However I'd avoid Windows Explorer's behavior where you can only navigate around (without selecting anything) by holding Ctrl, as that might lead to errors when you're making a large selection. IMO we need to expand on the current system where message selections are a different "layer" from your other inputs (e.g. typing) and the arrow keys currently only let you scroll and should thus be considered free to use for that purpose.
Right now:
My Request:
If you accept the second suggestion then simply pressing up can be used for scrolling than editing.
I'm willing to help with a merge request if you will be inclined to tell me where to look at for these changes.