search

telehash / telehash-js

telehash javascript module for node.js and browserify
http://telehash.org
MIT License
301 stars 51 forks source link

jspm support #26

Open lewisl9029 opened 9 years ago

lewisl9029 commented 9 years ago

Hi,

I'm using jspm to manage my front-end dependencies as es6 modules and would like to be able to install telehash-js using using it as well.

However, right now telehash-js has github repositories as dependencies in its package.json, which throws off the jspm installer a bit.

One quick workaround offered by the developer behind jspm is to add registry: npm in the package.json of each github repo used as a dependency in telehash-js's package.json.

The more ideal solution in my opinion is simply to use the github repos' respective npm packages as dependencies instead. I did a quick check on npm and it looks like all of them exist as npm packages already, albeit some of them are a bit out-of-date.

Any thoughts? If the former solution is preferred, I can open some pull requests to make the necessary modifications to the github repos' package.json.

Thanks, Lewis.

quartzjer commented 9 years ago

Ahh, yes, those dependencies are just temporary for testing/dev ease and all need to be published. I'll get them updated hopefully tomorrow, good reminder, thx!

On Jan 19, 2015, at 10:09 PM, Lewis Liu notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi,

I'm using jspm to manage my front-end dependencies as es6 modules and would like to be able to install telehash-js using using it as well.

However, right now telehash-js has github repositories as dependencies in its package.json, which throws off the jspm installer a bit.

One quick workaround offered by the developer behind jspm is to add registry: npm in the package.json of each github repo used as a dependency in telehash-js's package.json.

The more ideal solution in my opinion is simply to use the github repos' respective npm packages as dependencies instead. I did a quick check on npm and it looks like all of them exist as npm packages already, albeit some of them are a bit out-of-date.

Any thoughts? If the former solution is preferred, I can open some pull requests to make the necessary modifications to the github repos' package.json.

Thanks, Lewis.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.