Closed fd closed 10 years ago
There seems to be an inconsistency between CS1a and CS2a/CS3a.
CS1a
CS2a
CS3a
CS2a and CS3a have the SEQ field before the KEY field. CS1a on the other hand has KEY come first.
SEQ
KEY
Is this intentional? Also wasn't SEQ split into "at" and IV?
"at"
IV
Indeed, I'll get the CS2a/CS3a updated asap to be consistent with the patterns in CS1a.
nice. I'm working on CS1a now CS3a should be working too. After that I'll be pushing an update for the Go implementation.
There seems to be an inconsistency between
CS1a
andCS2a
/CS3a
.CS2a
andCS3a
have theSEQ
field before theKEY
field.CS1a
on the other hand hasKEY
come first.Is this intentional? Also wasn't
SEQ
split into"at"
andIV
?