Closed Nottt closed 5 years ago
Looks like there are a lot of unassociated changes. Did you start your branch from the latest version of the master
branch?
Yes. It's not clean, but me and chazlarson tested it, should be fine. But if we desired we can create a clean branch and clean pull
I believe I created the branch here from dev, so I think the issues are my fault. I just created a new branch from master and started a new pull request and none of those extraneous changes are in it. I'll start a new pull request on that branch, which is currently named "docker-experimental-2".
OK, that new one [240] is much cleaner, but it has my name on it. Nottt, if you want you can do another pull request to that branch to replace this one and the test one I just did. OR we can just use the new one. Doesn't make any difference to me.
I am not sure you can truly rename a branch in github. I think you'll have to delete that one and create another one regardless (like I saw here when I tried).
So if you have to create another one anyway I'd prefer if you just delete those 2 here, close the pull requests, create a new one clean and then I'll make the pull request again no problem. But either way I'm fine.
Also what do you think of the branch being called docker? That way we can pull with tellytv/docker
which is short, intuitive and the current dockers (ex: tellytv/telly:dev-ffmpeg
) will not be affected while makes for a smooth transition.
You can tell people wanting to try the new docker to use tellytv/docker
, and when you feel confident, you phase out the others and you can have tellytv/docker-dev
branch for tellytv/docker:dev
tag in the docker hub.
But that would just be my suggestions, up to you guys ^^
OK, I closed my pull request on the docker-experimental-2
branch and renamed it docker
.
Main improvements: