Closed faddat closed 2 years ago
Merging #230 (83d85ef) into master (e09e4d6) will decrease coverage by
0.05%
. The diff coverage is90.00%
.:exclamation: Current head 83d85ef differs from pull request most recent head 2dd592c. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2dd592c to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #230 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.54% 68.48% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 27 27
Lines 2130 2126 -4
==========================================
- Hits 1460 1456 -4
Misses 595 595
Partials 75 75
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
badger_db.go | 87.77% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
boltdb.go | 57.25% <ø> (ø) |
|
boltdb_batch.go | 82.69% <ø> (ø) |
|
boltdb_iterator.go | 92.10% <ø> (ø) |
|
cleveldb.go | 70.99% <ø> (ø) |
|
cleveldb_batch.go | 82.35% <ø> (ø) |
|
db.go | 35.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
prefixdb_iterator.go | 81.01% <ø> (-0.24%) |
:arrow_down: |
rocksdb.go | 72.26% <ø> (ø) |
|
rocksdb_batch.go | 84.31% <ø> (ø) |
|
... and 3 more |
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
badger_db.go | 87.77% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
boltdb.go | 57.25% <ø> (ø) |
|
boltdb_batch.go | 82.69% <ø> (ø) |
|
boltdb_iterator.go | 92.10% <ø> (ø) |
|
cleveldb.go | 70.99% <ø> (ø) |
|
cleveldb_batch.go | 82.35% <ø> (ø) |
|
db.go | 35.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
prefixdb_iterator.go | 81.01% <ø> (-0.24%) |
:arrow_down: |
rocksdb.go | 72.26% <ø> (ø) |
|
rocksdb_batch.go | 84.31% <ø> (ø) |
|
... and 3 more |
Remaining things to do here include adding pebbledb to the iavl benchmarks
this contains a bug affecting goleveldb that we added while messing about. I'm going to close it and submit a pr that only touches pebble stuff.
I spoke with the Terra team, and they mentioned that because their CosmWasm usage is high, there were issues with cgo/FFI (Rocks will hit this, as will CosmWasm, and this resulted in high overhead) when using RockDB, making it a less than ideal solution for their needs. Since CosmWasm is being adopted pretty widely in Cosmos, we're experimenting with PebbleDB, which outperforms RocksDB in synthetic benchmark tests.
Currently, the goal of these changes is to be able to test them and see if they increase RPC capacity on relayers, so that the IBC relay network can be more reliable.