Support to define directives with nested controller

Hello, i have a problem using this library, i tell you why... i'm using directives with a nested controller, something like this:

export class AnnouncementsDirective {
  constructor() {
    let directive = {
      restrict: 'E',
      template: require('./announcements.html'),
      controller: AnnouncementsController,
      controllerAs: 'ann',
      scope: {},
      bindToController: {}
    };
    return directive;
  }
}

and the controller...

class AnnouncementsController {
  constructor(
    private $scope: ng.IScope,
    private $window: ng.IWindowService,
    private modalService: ModalService,
    private announcementsService: service.announcements.GUIAnnouncementsService,
  ) { }

and when expose this directive to angular, i do in this way

export default angular.module('proteusGui.announcements', [])
  .directive('proteusAnnouncements', () => new AnnouncementsDirective())  .
  .name;

so.. this library have not support to this kind of definition, because in this line..

  .directive('proteusAnnouncements', () => new AnnouncementsDirective())

i do not pass the injection dependencies because i do this in the controller directly.

you think in any way to use this kind of directives using quickmock? one obvios way is exporting the controller and expose it to angular, something like this:

export class AnnouncementsController {...}
export default angular.module('proteusGui.announcements', [])
  .directive('proteusAnnouncements', () => new AnnouncementsDirective())
  .controller('AnnouncementsController', AnnouncementsController)
  .name;

but i prefer using the nested controller.

thanks in advanced

tennisgent / quickmock

Support to define directives with nested controller #13