Closed tensfeldt closed 4 years ago
I can partly replicate this as of by loading tc016 and making the following changes:
mct$OPTIMIZEKEL <- 1
mct$AUC.1.T1 <- 0
mct$AUC.1.T2 <- 24
mct$AUC.2.T1 <- 48
mct$AUC.2.T2 <- 240
mct$AUC.3.T1 <- 24
mct$AUC.3.T2 <- 460
I have activated OPTIMIZEKEL for this test case as tc016 has no FLGEXKEL == 0 values provided by a user.
The time points for this testcase are:
> table(d$PKPTMS, useNA = "always")
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 5 9 13 24 48 72 96 168 408 <NA>
76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 38 38 38 37 38 0
The output was:
PKDATAROWID SDEID TIME CEST_KEL CEST_INT CEST_EXT CEST_C0 CEST_TLAST
1 34680748 12596809 1.5 922.4714 NA NA NA NA
2 34680749 12596809 2.0 914.6196 NA NA NA NA
3 34680750 12596809 3.0 899.1159 NA NA NA NA
4 34680751 12596809 5.0 868.8925 NA NA NA NA
5 34680752 12596809 9.0 811.4594 NA NA NA NA
6 34680753 12596809 13.0 757.8225 NA NA NA NA
7 -34680754 12596809 24.0 627.9059 NA NA NA NA
8 -34680755 12596809 48.0 416.5805 NA NA NA NA
9 -34680756 12596809 72.0 276.3779 NA NA NA 276.3779
10 NA 12596809 240.0 NA NA 15.6363100 NA NA
11 NA 12596809 460.0 NA NA 0.3636426 NA NA
12 34682241 34123765 1.5 63575.0642 NA NA NA NA
13 34682242 34123765 2.0 63070.1172 NA NA NA NA
14 34682243 34123765 3.0 62072.2230 NA NA NA NA
15 34682244 34123765 5.0 60123.5507 NA NA NA NA
16 34682245 34123765 9.0 56407.8134 NA NA NA NA
17 34682246 34123765 13.0 52921.7149 NA NA NA NA
18 -34682247 34123765 24.0 44406.2581 NA NA NA NA
19 -34682248 34123765 96.0 14084.7055 NA NA NA NA
20 -34682249 34123765 168.0 4467.3642 NA NA NA NA
21 NA 34123765 460.0 NA NA 42.4189938 NA NA
22 -34681288 46932787 96.0 1655.1580 NA NA NA NA
23 -34681289 46932787 168.0 1074.4041 NA NA NA NA
24 -34681290 46932787 408.0 254.4456 NA NA NA 254.4456
25 NA 46932787 460.0 NA NA 186.2319624 NA NA
The output for est_data
shows that the extrapolated point 460 is always provided in est_data
, however 240 is only provided when it is considered to be an extrapolated value. It does not appear when it is interpolated. This may be related to #54.
I've also noticed that the est_data
output for SDEID == 34123765 (included in the comment above) has no value for CEST_TLAST
. Is this working as intended @tensfeldt? Should every individual have a value for CEST_TLAST
in est_data
or is it only when it is included in the KEL regression that it appears in est_data
?
As of commit 18821dca00 this issue appears to be fixed. Please note that to test this issue OPTIMIZEKEL must equal 1, as tc016 has flags$FLGEXKEL == 1 for all records.
The updated results are shown below. Time point 48 is a mixed existing/interpolated point, point 240 is a mixed interpolated/extrapolated point, point 460 is an extrapolated point.
PKDATAROWID SDEID TIME CEST_KEL CEST_INT CEST_EXT CEST_C0 CEST_TLAST
1 34680748 12596809 1.5 922.4714 NA NA NA NA
2 34680749 12596809 2.0 914.6196 NA NA NA NA
3 34680750 12596809 3.0 899.1159 NA NA NA NA
4 34680751 12596809 5.0 868.8925 NA NA NA NA
5 34680752 12596809 9.0 811.4594 NA NA NA NA
6 34680753 12596809 13.0 757.8225 NA NA NA NA
7 -34680754 12596809 24.0 627.9059 NA NA NA NA
8 -34680755 12596809 48.0 416.5805 NA NA NA NA
9 -34680756 12596809 72.0 276.3779 NA NA NA 276.3779
10 NA 12596809 240.0 NA NA 15.6363100 NA NA
11 NA 12596809 460.0 NA NA 0.3636426 NA NA
13 34682241 34123765 1.5 63575.0642 NA NA NA NA
21 34682242 34123765 2.0 63070.1172 NA NA NA NA
31 34682243 34123765 3.0 62072.2230 NA NA NA NA
41 34682244 34123765 5.0 60123.5507 NA NA NA NA
51 34682245 34123765 9.0 56407.8134 NA NA NA NA
61 34682246 34123765 13.0 52921.7149 NA NA NA NA
71 -34682247 34123765 24.0 44406.2581 NA NA NA NA
101 NA 34123765 48.0 NA 32500.000 NA NA NA
81 -34682248 34123765 96.0 14084.7055 NA NA NA NA
91 -34682249 34123765 168.0 4467.3642 NA NA NA NA
111 NA 34123765 240.0 NA 3424.000 NA NA NA
12 NA 34123765 460.0 NA NA 42.4189938 NA NA
14 NA 46932787 48.0 NA 5053.333 NA NA NA
22 -34681288 46932787 96.0 1655.1580 NA NA NA NA
32 -34681289 46932787 168.0 1074.4041 NA NA NA NA
52 NA 46932787 240.0 NA 900.700 NA NA NA
42 -34681290 46932787 408.0 254.4456 NA NA NA 254.4456
62 NA 46932787 460.0 NA NA 186.2319624 NA NA
SDEID AUC0_24 AUC48_240 AUC24_460
1 104901531 30033.67 60537.05 87766.05
2 115532321 544310.74 1168268.77 1873863.52
3 12596809 17924.53 23187.94 37267.84
4 139290479 1151283.85 1454957.40 2366346.68
5 161254335 1019871.21 1602976.56 2473776.81
6 176001863 503841.29 328706.96 609406.58
7 181090944 147000.51 237615.12 390816.09
8 192572639 26087.56 76068.43 114867.27
9 249494359 939855.48 1181130.30 1850076.35
10 252389071 116467.22 122213.99 199314.83
11 290825038 491075.67 596478.19 972069.22
12 303601078 125541.11 293577.00 458445.91
13 322018548 27010.89 64460.65 95720.12
14 323495986 30863.47 45565.34 72344.07
15 324958357 156936.77 301446.58 456191.70
No partial AUCs are reported in parameter results Estimated concentration dataset is missing entries for 240 and 460 as indicated by the partial aucs specified below.