Closed dipanjanS closed 3 years ago
Check out this pull request on
Review Jupyter notebook visual diffs & provide feedback on notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB
Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).
:memo: Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.
Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here with @googlebot I signed it!
and we'll verify it.
ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.
Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).
:memo: Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.
Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here with @googlebot I signed it!
and we'll verify it.
ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.
@googlebot I signed it!
Thanks, let me get to this by this week and update with a corrected version
Hi @dipanjanS, just wanted to check in and see if you had time to work on this PR following my comments.
@arjung yep have worked on the changes you proposed, let me push an updated version soon and will tag you
All (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) CLAs are signed, but one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter.
We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that by leaving a comment that contains only @googlebot I consent.
in this pull request.
Note to project maintainer: There may be cases where the author cannot leave a comment, or the comment is not properly detected as consent. In those cases, you can manually confirm consent of the commit author(s), and set the cla
label to yes
(if enabled on your project).
ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.
All (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) CLAs are signed, but one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter.
We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that by leaving a comment that contains only @googlebot I consent.
in this pull request.
Note to project maintainer: There may be cases where the author cannot leave a comment, or the comment is not properly detected as consent. In those cases, you can manually confirm consent of the commit author(s), and set the cla
label to yes
(if enabled on your project).
ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.
@arjung for some reason a lot of older files seem to have come up in this commit from other folders even though I rebased. Not sure why this came up, let me create a fresh PR and tag it here
Hi @arjung please find the updated notebook in this fresh PR: https://github.com/tensorflow/neural-structured-learning/pull/76 and you can close this one. Apologies on creating a fresh one, for some reason rebase seemed to show up some older files as ones to be committed which I didn't modify.
Thanks for working on it! I think (but am not 100% sure) that rebasing in general after a review has started will make it impossible to do incremental reviews. A new PR also means that we'll have lost the history of comments/replies from this PR, and again no way to do an incremental review :(.
Btw some of comments still don't have a response. Could you take a look at them and let me know if/how you acted on them? That'll help me review the new PR.
@arjung sure thanks for taking the time and apologies not sure why this happened :( I will double check next time before pushing the commit if necessary
I have commented on all your review comments above and made the necessary changes in the other PR.
Thanks, will get to the new PR before the end of the week.
Closing this PR since new updates are in #76.
Hi @arjung as discussed. Please find the adversarial learning notebook example.
I have added it in the
neural_structured_learning/examples/notebooks
as you had mentioned. Feel free to suggest the necessary edits and changes to keep in line with Google & TF standards and I will make the necessary changes based on feedback.