Closed michi42 closed 7 years ago
@agorzawski @kaifox for further comments & discussion
General commnet: For the changes() options it was/is more playground and different ideas. The main part of this branch is to provide the: calcBoolean(whatever)... functionality
@kaifox Thanks for the comments. However, if you would read my email it was written to start with one specific class. Inside there were two syntaxes proposed. One path was to be chosen. most of the comments you've put on the path that was a proposal as an alternative... never mind, Thanks anyway! I can only work on that ąround Sun...
Hi Arek,
sorry for the many comments and thanks for your answer! No worries ... I was eager now to try a few things... Thanks for all your efforts ... it is motivating ;-) I think we are on the right way ... some more documentation and tests to do ... and then merge with the other supports ... ... and then comes the hard work: Expressions ;-) (But we are well prepared now... everything is already in operations...) Thanks again.
cu
kajetan
Please only merge once agreed with Arek. This PullRequest is merely to be able to review the changes in a more convenient way.
@kaifox @agorzawski