Closed YoungjaeDev closed 2 years ago
Hi @youngjae-avikus , I totally relate with your issue. I have tried to run it on Jetson. You are right, SORT is somewhat slow on the CPU. If you're willing to sacrifice precision, I recommend IOUTracker C++ implementations of SORT are probably faster, but I have not tested these.
Is DeepSort the same because it is Feature info + Sort
after all?
I'm curious about how to attach the tracker at Real time.
Thank you
If you're looking for speed, DeepSORT won't help you - it runs a separate neural network on top of the object detection. Check out QSORT, which I think is close to a drop-in replacement for SORT.
thank you! I wonder that sort is kf+iou tracker? Predicting with Kf and doing association with iou, this is how I think. is it right? I think iou tracker is more faster!
@youngjae-avikus Yes your understanding is correct- I suggest you take a look at the code, it's relatively clearly written and commented.
Sort takes about 5-9 times more than the yolo5 detect I think it's due to
CPU processing
, is there any way to reduce it?Thank you