Documentation, website (with exception of the very top of Wormhole page) and packaging name the cards "n150s" (and "n300s") but get_board_type() names them just "n150" and "n300" respectively. Those shortened names are then displayed in tt-smi.
Was that a last-minute Marketing name change not yet reflected in code and parts of the web page, or are there non-s variants planned that this omission intentionally prepares for?
While n150 is not compared in tt-smi or tt-flash, tt-smi does check for n300 currently.
Independently, tt-flash does its own change_to_public_name() mapping, also omitting the s.
Documentation, website (with exception of the very top of Wormhole page) and packaging name the cards "n150s" (and "n300s") but
get_board_type()
names them just "n150" and "n300" respectively. Those shortened names are then displayed intt-smi
.Was that a last-minute Marketing name change not yet reflected in code and parts of the web page, or are there non-s variants planned that this omission intentionally prepares for?
While
n150
is not compared intt-smi
ortt-flash
,tt-smi
does check forn300
currently.Independently,
tt-flash
does its ownchange_to_public_name()
mapping, also omitting the s.