Closed ghost closed 4 years ago
Do you think just removing the function would be better? Sure, that requires amajor version bump but it might be worth it given the small adoption the library has
Do you think just removing the function would be better? Sure, that requires amajor version bump but it might be worth it given the small adoption the library has
I simply didn't think that this should make it a nextcloud-link v2.0.0… from a semver POV, yes, it could also be done like that, but feels odd.
I could add a deadline when I'll remove the function alltogether
I could add a deadline when I'll remove the function alltogether
Yeah, you could say something along the line of "this will be removed in version 2"
Yess, update incoming
added function to pipe data located at the provided path into the provided writable stream
renamed
pipeStream
touploadFromStream
anddownloadToStream
[x] I have carefully evaluated the risks of this change
[x] This change does not remove existing functionality
[x] I have written tests to cover all risks
[x] I updated the docs