tenzir / threatbus

🚌 Threat Bus – A threat intelligence dissemination layer for open-source security tools.
https://docs.tenzir.com/threatbus
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
258 stars 16 forks source link

Do not retromatch indicators without `to_ids` flag #189

Closed satta closed 2 years ago

satta commented 2 years ago

It would be desirable to (optionally) completely exclude indicators received from MISP without the to_ids flag in MISP from retromatching.

mavam commented 2 years ago

This sounds like a reasonable change to me. Should this behavior be the default?

satta commented 2 years ago

I guess so. The issue that I think should be kept in mind before implementing is that one might want to see the to_ids changes on the bus but never retromatch on such events.

shadow145866 commented 2 years ago

to_ids

Sent from my Redmi Note 6 Pro using FastHub

tobim commented 2 years ago

The current behavior should be that newly created indicators without the to_ids are completely ignored. Existing indicators that are edited and have the flag removed are handled as "indicator removal" in vast_threatbus and also won't trigger a retromatch. @satta if you can observe something different it should be treated as a bug.

Also @satta if I understand your request correctly then you would like a change so that new indicators without the flag will also get sent over the bus, but should be ignored in vast_threatbus?

satta commented 2 years ago

The current behavior should be that newly created indicators without the to_ids are completely ignored.

This is actually what I wanted. Just wanted to make sure this was already addressed. Thanks for confirming!