Open teorth opened 3 weeks ago
As discussed in https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/458659-Equational/topic/1076.20!.3D.3E.203/near/476933251 , we have in principle a formalized proof of these implications, but they are extremely large.
Specifically, we need
conjecture Equation713facts : ∃ (G : Type) ( : Magma G), Facts G [713] [817, 1426, 3862, 4065]
conjecture Equation1289facts : ∃ (G : Type) ( : Magma G), Facts G [1289] [3116, 4435]
See further discussion at https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/458659-Equational/topic/Remaining.20unformalized.20theorems.3F/near/479985776 and https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/458659-Equational/topic/713.2C.201289.2C.201447
1447 has been removed from this list as it has been proven by other means.
Proof can go in the ManuallyProved folder. When done, update ManuallyProved.lean, Conjectures.lean and add \lean and \leanok's to the blueprint.
ManuallyProved
ManuallyProved.lean
Conjectures.lean
Alternate proofs of 713, 1289 available at https://teorth.github.io/equational_theories/blueprint/infinite-magma-constructions-chapter.html#greedy-section
As discussed in https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/458659-Equational/topic/1076.20!.3D.3E.203/near/476933251 , we have in principle a formalized proof of these implications, but they are extremely large.
Specifically, we need
conjecture Equation713facts : ∃ (G : Type) ( : Magma G), Facts G [713] [817, 1426, 3862, 4065]
conjecture Equation1289facts : ∃ (G : Type) ( : Magma G), Facts G [1289] [3116, 4435]
See further discussion at https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/458659-Equational/topic/Remaining.20unformalized.20theorems.3F/near/479985776 and https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/458659-Equational/topic/713.2C.201289.2C.201447
1447 has been removed from this list as it has been proven by other means.
Proof can go in the
ManuallyProved
folder. When done, updateManuallyProved.lean
,Conjectures.lean
and add \lean and \leanok's to the blueprint.