I already have a "shared repository" at .. relative to the forest of Bazaar branches I have. This is a common pattern, and how you avoid having a full copy of the revisions inside each branch. So, we have a ["shared] Repository ["] at ~/src/project with
~/src/project/.bzr/repository/packs/*.pack
and then many Branches (with Working Trees), each with branch metadata:
So rather than pulling from a remote (ie launchpad) branch, I'm working locally where all the revisions are already present., Using git-bzr-ng to create a git mirror,
$ cd ~/src/project
$ git bzr clone mainline converted
works fine [awesome!], creating ~/src/project/converted with a Git tree in it as expected. However, your design for holding Bazaar revision info quietly inside its .git means that we have a second copy of the same information:
Would it be possible instead to use the existing information at:
~/src/project/.bzr/repository/packs/*.pack
? This would seem morally equivalent to git clone's --shared or --reference arguments; I'd be fine with having to manually specify the location, though bzr itself searches parent directories for a repo with the required revisions, so in a way I was surprised that your code overrode that. Fair enough, but if we could share revisions then it would save a lot of disk space.
Doing conversions from Bazaar to Git locally.
I already have a "shared repository" at
..
relative to the forest of Bazaar branches I have. This is a common pattern, and how you avoid having a full copy of the revisions inside each branch. So, we have a ["shared] Repository ["] at~/src/project
withand then many Branches (with Working Trees), each with branch metadata:
and so on.
So rather than pulling from a remote (ie launchpad) branch, I'm working locally where all the revisions are already present., Using git-bzr-ng to create a git mirror,
works fine [awesome!], creating
~/src/project/converted
with a Git tree in it as expected. However, your design for holding Bazaar revision info quietly inside its.git
means that we have a second copy of the same information:Would it be possible instead to use the existing information at:
? This would seem morally equivalent to
git clone
's--shared
or--reference
arguments; I'd be fine with having to manually specify the location, though bzr itself searches parent directories for a repo with the required revisions, so in a way I was surprised that your code overrode that. Fair enough, but if we could share revisions then it would save a lot of disk space.AfC