Closed allysonlister closed 1 year ago
As with the guidelines themselves, I am placing Indicator in the ICE hierarchy. It is also a new hierarchy that should go to our community view.
I am also naming it "evaluation indicator" as its goal is to confer compliance against a guideline.
I am still not completely happy with the label for the object property from learning medium to evaluation indicator, but have decided to go with 'demonstrates how to fulfil the requirements for', and the label can be updated in future as required.
I had decided on 'details', but the confusion when reading the property about whether it was details as a noun or verb made it clear I should use demonstrates.
Also adding an initial set of indicators from the FAIRplus DSM model.
Added indicators at https://fairplus.github.io/Data-Maturity/docs/Indicators/ . Please note that these do not appear to have PIDs, so have reluctantly minted PIDs for them.
Indicator is a new class hierarchy so that we can state the practical way in which a learning medium meets a particular guideline. For an example from the FAIR Cookbook and the FAIRplus data maturity indicators:
RecipeX demonstrates/details how to fulfil the requirements for DSM-4-R3. DSM-4-R3 confers compliance with I1 (meta)data use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly applicable language for knowledge representation. RecipeX confers practical skill (or knowledge) about semantic data and semantic interoperability. RecipeX confers competency in data harmonization.
Any comments about the wording or the modelling are most welcome.