[Package]: iperf2

[huupoke12]

Why is it worth to add this package?

While there is an iperf3 package available, but Microsoft advised against using it on Windows machines. So to benchmark with Windows machines, iperf2 should be used. Additionally, iperf3 also lacks some features that iperf2 provides.

Home page URL

https://sourceforge.net/projects/iperf2/

Source code URL

https://sourceforge.net/p/iperf2/code/ci/master/tree/

Packaging policy acknowledgement

• [X] The project is actively developed.

• [X] The project has existing packages and is "well known".

• [X] Licensed under an open source license.

• [X] Not available through a language package manager: pip, npm, cpan, cargo, etc.

• [X] Not taking up too much disk space (< 100MiB per architecture, exceptions can be made)

• [ ] Not duplicating the functionality of existing packages.

• [X] Not serving hacking, malware, phishing, spamming, spying, ddos functionality.

• [X] I certify that I have read Termux Packaging Policy and understand that my request will be denied if it is found lacking.

Additional information

No response

[twaik]

There is the iperf3 package, so I am fixing the checklist.