leanify

[TPS]

Why is it worth to add this package?

Very good recursive minifier/optimizer for a wide variety of compressed archives, documents, & files

Home page URL

https://github.com/JayXon/Leanify

Source code URL

https://github.com/JayXon/Leanify

Packaging policy acknowledgement

• [X] The project is actively developed.

• [X] The project has existing packages and is "well known".

• [X] Licensed under an open source license.

• [X] Not available through a language package manager: pip, npm, cpan, cargo, etc.

• [X] Not taking up too much disk space (< 100MiB per architecture, exceptions can be made)

• [X] Not duplicating the functionality of existing packages.

• [X] Not serving hacking, malware, phishing, spamming, spying, ddos functionality.

• [X] I certify that I have read Termux Packaging Policy and understand that my request will be denied if it is found lacking.

Additional information

N.B.: Project no longer has standard releases, but has more of rolling releases.

[TomJo2000]

That packaging list is looking pretty slim. https://repology.org/project/leanify/versions

and the commits are looking pretty sporadic. https://github.com/JayXon/Leanify/commits/master/

I'm not opposed to this package, but I think it would be a better fit for the TUR.

[TPS]

@TomJo2000 Would you be willing to move the request there? 🙇🏾‍♂️

[TomJo2000]

I can do that later. I have it very close to building fine locally.

The Makefile just doesn't have a install target, so I need to overwrite that step of the build process. Other than that, was pretty simple to get it to compile. Just had to add

TERMUX_PKG_DEPENDS='libiconv_open'
# and
termux_step_post_configure() {
    CFLAGS+=' -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable'
    LDFLAGS+=' -liconv'
}

to the standard build script template after filling in the package details.

[TomJo2000]

Got it building. I'll tidy it up, do some testing and send a pull request to the TUR after I get back from running some errands.

[TomJo2000]

Closed by termux-user-repository/tur#1123