Closed alive4ever closed 7 years ago
From https://github.com/termux/termux-packages/pull/597:
Hm, links2 seems a bit dead/stagnant as a project, and contains no issue tracker or open forum to open issues against. I'm a bit hesitant to add these kind of projects - does it bring any advantages over w3m or lynx?
Let me know if you need links2 over w3m or lynx!
I still prefer links2
over elinks
, since the links2 default configuration is safer than elinks default.
links2
will warn on invalid certificates, whereas elinks
will gladly accept invalid certificates.
links2
also has better support for latest tls libraries.
w3m
is out of option, since mouse tracking only works when TERM=xterm
. lynx
is also out of option, since mouse tracking has to be expicitly enabled from command line -use_mouse
. lynx
also doesn't support frames, which links2
and elinks
support.
It would be better to offer alternatives for browsers, since links2
is very lightweight and doesn't require much resources to build and maintain. Compare it to emacs
as reference.
I pointed wrong Debian package as reference. The package should be links
, which is links2
without graphics support.
I would love to see links2 packaged for termux.
It's an alternative to
elinks
, which hasn't had any stable release since 2012.Thanks.