Closed arunherb closed 2 weeks ago
Hi @arunherb , thanks for the updates, I have some questions:
target species - deer
, target species - wild dog
, is it boolean or LUT? Their app endpoint says it's LUT - https://core.vocabs.paratoo.tern.org.au/documentation#/Sign-based-active-plot-search-surveytrack photo ID
, we have a similar one fauna track photo ID
, added in both track station
and vehicle track
, are they the same? https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/3a69c876-d085-50c3-9a63-e3b7e82dcbc0number of observers
is removed from off-plot
, should we remove it from all sub protocols?off-plot
attributes collection file, but there is no concept file for it, do you know what it is?number of warren entrances
, number of den entrances
, number of burrow entrances
have metadata files in within-plot
, but OP URIs are not added to OP collection file, can you please add it?off-plot
, the metadata file of OP NVIS major vegetation group
has the wrong value of properties collection, can you please update it?vehicle track
, can you please remove the URI of OP number of individuals
? looks like it's replaced by new OP attributable fauna count
track station
, wrong URI is added for new OP attributable fauna count
, can you please fix it in both collection file and metadata file? please also remove the URI of OP number of individuals
in collection file.within-plot
OP collection file, can you please replace https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/0d7f98b2-9741-4dff-9849-5818ed64dbf4 (metadata URI of OP den active status
) with https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/0bc353aa-f678-5948-9fe7-6e0c39b2a6d6 (OP URI)within-plot
, same for the OP number of den entrances
, in OP collection file, can you please replace https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/6f518640-e5cd-43f4-87ed-09550778ad9e with https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/c497a8eb-f720-52a4-bc76-8ec1cf7d4cf2?within-plot
, same for OP number of warren entrances
, in the OP collection file, can you please replace https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/be6b5545-d4a8-45e7-be0a-bc662a40af78 with https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/26147520-7e7c-5b55-b2fa-197a02b7ab33within-plot
, same for OP number of burrow entrances
, in the OP collection file, can you please replace https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/ea3232ea-13b6-5167-ae55-ad71ffcf3eb7 with https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/dd805508-1eca-5b8b-b2e4-c51c1682e81e?number of burrow entrances
in within-plot
and plot sign search
share the same URI, can you please generate a new UUID for one of them?within-plot
, the metadata file of OP number of warren entrances
has wrong value of protocolModule, can you please fix it?dingo - Canis lupus dingo
, we already have a concept Dingo (Canis lupus dingo)
, are they the same?dingo-dog hybrid
, we have a concept Dingo-Dog hybrid
, they look the same.categorical_concepts.ttl
looks the same - https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/ffdac5da-c5a1-54e9-8e71-71c0503f4491 & https://linked.data.gov.au/def/nrm/69369a4b-1608-58c9-b37c-00758d401bf4deer species types
and wild dog species types
, can you please add them to collection-members.ttl?deer species types
, can you please compare it with endpoint https://core.vocabs.paratoo.tern.org.au/api/lut-deer-pests, and add this to the source?target species - deer
's value type is IRI, can we link new LUT deer species types
with it?deer
added in LUT target species types
, but looks like the concept URI is not added to the collection, the collection URI in metadata is wrong. wild dog types
, can we add this endpoint in the source as well https://core.vocabs.paratoo.tern.org.au/api/lut-pest-wild-dogs?scat removal statuses
, can you please add this endpoint in the source as well? https://core.vocabs.paratoo.tern.org.au/api/lut-scatsHi @arunherb , thanks for the updates, can you please have a look at following issues:
transect id
, but attribute transect ID code
was added;fauna sign comments
and fauna sign presence
, can you please remove the tern:valueType
in concept files, cuz it's defined in metadata files;within plot
and off plot
, the metadata files of OP fauna sign presence
should have quadrat
as its feature type, the URI is http://linked.data.gov.au/def/tern-cv/4362c8f2-b3cc-4816-b5a2-fb7bb4c0cff5track station substrates
, for each metadata, values of urnp:categoricalCollection
and schema:url
are not correct; And looks like the metadata of concepts sand
and tracking pad
are mixed, probably because they used the same metadata URI, can you please fix it?tern:isAttributeOf
in the concept file of OP fauna sign comments
cuz it was converted to OP, not attribute now;fauna track photo ID
, tern:Sample
and tern:FeatureOfInterest
are both values of tern:isAttributeOf
, can you please fix it?
Thanks!Hi @arunherb , thanks for the updates, can you please have a look at following issues:
- In this commit, 7a00c23, need to add attribute
transect id
, but attributetransect ID code
was added; - DONE- For OPs
fauna sign comments
andfauna sign presence
, can you please remove thetern:valueType
in concept files, cuz it's defined in metadata files; Done- In
within plot
andoff plot
, the metadata files of OPfauna sign presence
should havequadrat
as its feature type, the URI is http://linked.data.gov.au/def/tern-cv/4362c8f2-b3cc-4816-b5a2-fb7bb4c0cff5 Done- In the new LUT
track station substrates
, for each metadata, values ofurnp:categoricalCollection
andschema:url
are not correct; And looks like the metadata of conceptssand
andtracking pad
are mixed, probably because they used the same metadata URI, can you please fix it?Done- Can you please remove the
tern:isAttributeOf
in the concept file of OPfauna sign comments
cuz it was converted to OP, not attribute now; Done- In the concept file for attribute
fauna track photo ID
,tern:Sample
andtern:FeatureOfInterest
are both values oftern:isAttributeOf
, can you please fix it? Done Thanks!
Hi @arunherb , thanks for the updates, looks like the file path in schema:url
for metadata is still wrong, can you please fix it? for LUT track substrate types
Hi @arunherb , thanks for the updates, looks like the file path in
schema:url
for metadata is still wrong, can you please fix it? for LUTtrack substrate types
Thanks for checking this. I have fixed it now.
Updated 'scat removal status' labels, in 'categorical concept file' and d metadata file; and renamed 'number of transects to be completetd'