Closed rogeruiz closed 1 year ago
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this issue will be closed in 10 days
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this issue will be closed in 10 days
This issue was automatically closed because of stale in 10 days
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days β³. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
Is your request related to a new offering from AWS?
Yes β this functionality was added in version 4.45.0 of the AWS provider.
Is your request related to a problem? Please describe.
I recently opened a new PR trying to add this functionality but discovered that there was more work to it than just adding the variable to the
endpoint_settings
. Helpfully, @bryantbiggs mentioned that there was more work to be done in order to get the functionality of version 4.45.0 of the AWS provider.Describe the solution you'd like.
I'd like to be able to configure an S3 Endpoint with the
aws_dms_s3_endpoint
resource rather than theaws_dms_endpoint
resource when configuring DMS using this module. This would be helpful because theexpected_bucket_owner
is only configurable through theaws_dms_s3_endpoint
. Also the setting for S3 is only supported on version3.4.7
of the AWS DMS service.Describe alternatives you've considered.
None. I think it's a straightforward refactor even if it is a more complicated change than adding a new property.
Additional context
As I mentioned earlier, the S3 setting is only available in version
3.4.7
and above so it would be great to have some cross-variable validation to help prevent users from messing up the configuration.